Βιβλιογραφία από Wikipedia

1.     1.    Cover JA, Curd M, eds. (1998), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, pp. 1–82

2.    •  Hansson SO (2008), "Science and Pseudoscience", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Section 2: The "science" of pseudoscience

3.    •  Shermer (1997).

4.    •  Lakatos I (1973). "Science and Pseudoscience". The London School of Economics and Political Science, Dept of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method. Archived from the original (mp3) on 25 July 2011. "Science and Pseudoscience (transcript)". Archived from the original on 28 July 2011.

5.    •  Hansson, Sven Ove (3 September 2008). "Science and Pseudo-Science, Section 1: The purpose of demarcations". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 16 April 2011. From a practical point of view, the distinction is important for decision guidance in both private and public life. Since science is our most reliable source of knowledge in a wide variety of areas, we need to distinguish scientific knowledge from its look-alikes. Due to the high status of science in present-day society, attempts to exaggerate the scientific status of various claims, teachings, and products are common enough to make the demarcation issue pressing in many areas.

6.    •  Hurd PD (1998). "Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world". Science Education. 82 (3): 407–16. Bibcode:1998SciEd..82..407H. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G.(subscription required)

7.    •  Vyse, Stuart (10 July 2019). "What Should Become of a Monument to Pseudoscience?". Skeptical Inquirer. Center for Inquiry. Retrieved 1 December 2019.

8.    •  "How anti-vax pseudoscience seeps into public discourse". Salon. 13 January 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2020.

9.    •  "Anti-vaccination websites use 'science' and stories to support claims, study finds". Johns Hopkins. Science Daily. Retrieved 16 December 2020.

10.    •  Frietsch U (7 April 2015). "The boundaries of science/ pseudoscience". European History Online. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017.

11.    •  "pseudo", The Free Dictionary, Farlex, Inc., 2015

12.    •  "Online Etymology Dictionary". Douglas Harper. 2015.

13.    •  "pseudoscience". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)

14.    •  Andrews & Henry (1796), p. 87.

15.    •  Magendie F (1843). An Elementary Treatise on Human Physiology. John Revere (5th ed.). New York: Harper. p. 150.

16.    •  Lamont, Peter (2013). Extraordinary Beliefs: A Historical Approach to a Psychological Problem. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-1107019331.

17.    •  Lamont, Peter (2013). Extraordinary Beliefs: A Historical Approach to a Psychological Problem. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-1107019331. When the eminent French physiologist, Fran?ois Magendie, first coined the term ‘pseudo-science’ in 1843, he was referring to phrenology.

18.    •  Abbott (2012).

19.    •  Yeates (2018), p. 42.

20.    •  Still A, Dryden W (2004). "The Social Psychology of "Pseudoscience": A Brief History". J Theory Soc Behav. 34 (3): 265–90. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00248.x.

21.    •  Bowler J (2003). Evolution: The History of an Idea (3rd ed.). University of California Press. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-520-23693-6.

22.    •  Parker Jones, O., Alfaro-Almagro, F., & Jbabdi, S. (2018). An empirical, 21st century evaluation of phrenology. Cortex. Volume 106. pp. 26–35. doi: doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.011

23.    •  Gauch (2003), pp. 3–5 ff.

24.    •  Gauch (2003), pp. 191 ff, especially Chapter 6, "Probability", and Chapter 7, "inductive Logic and Statistics"

25.    •  Popper K (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-27844-7. The German version is currently in print by Mohr Siebeck (ISBN 3-16-148410-X).

26.    •  Popper (1963), pp. 43–86.

27.    •  Sagan (1994), p. 171.

28.    •  Casti JL (1990). Paradigms lost: tackling the unanswered mysteries of modern science (1st ed.). New York: Avon Books. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-0-380-71165-9.

29.    •  Thagard (1978), pp. 223 ff.

30.    •  Bunge (1983a).

31.    •  Novella, Steven (2018). The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake. Grand Central Publishing. p. 165.

32.    •  Feyerabend, Paul (1975). "Table of contents and final chapter". Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. ISBN 978-0-86091-646-8.

33.    •  Gauch (2003), p. 88.

34.    •  Thagard (1978), pp. 227–228.

35.    •  Laudan L (1996). "The demise of the demarcation problem". In Ruse M (ed.). But Is It Science?: The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. pp. 337–350.

36.    •  McNally RJ (2003). "Is the pseudoscience concept useful for clinical psychology?". The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. 2 (2). Archived from the original on 30 April 2010.

37.    •  Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1990). Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 54.

38.    •  "Pseudoscientific". Oxford American Dictionary. Oxford English Dictionary. Pseudoscientific – pretending to be scientific, falsely represented as being scientific

39.    •  "Pseudoscience". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009.

40.    •  K?re Letrud, "The Gordian Knot of Demarcation: Tying Up Some Loose Ends" International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):3–11 (2019)

41.    •  Popper, Karl R. (Karl Raimund) (2002). Conjectures and refutations : the growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge. pp. 33–39. ISBN 0415285933. OCLC 49593492.

42.    •  Greener M (2007). "Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?". EMBO Reports. 8 (12): 1107–09. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. PMC 2267227. PMID 18059309.

43.    •  Bunge (1983b).

44.    •  Gauch (2003), pp. 211 ff, (Probability, "Common Blunders").

45.    •  Popper K (1963). Conjectures and Refutations (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.

46.    •  Churchland PM (1999). Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0262530743.

47.    •  Gauch (2003), pp. 269 ff, "Parsimony and Efficiency".

48.    •  Hines T (1988). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal: A Critical Examination of the Evidence. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-0-87975-419-8.

49.    •  Donald E. Simanek. "What is science? What is pseudoscience?". Archived from the original on 25 April 2009.

50.    •  Lakatos I (1970). "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes". In Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. pp. 91–195.